Storing, processing, and transmitting state confidential information are strictly prohibited on this website
DENG Jia-gan, HUANG Ren-tang. Revisite of the Energy Dependence on the Pulse Width in Gamma-Ray Bursts[J]. Astronomical Research and Technology, 2007, 4(1): 1-10.
Citation: DENG Jia-gan, HUANG Ren-tang. Revisite of the Energy Dependence on the Pulse Width in Gamma-Ray Bursts[J]. Astronomical Research and Technology, 2007, 4(1): 1-10.

Revisite of the Energy Dependence on the Pulse Width in Gamma-Ray Bursts

More Information
  • Received Date: February 08, 2006
  • Revised Date: March 07, 2006
  • Published Date: January 14, 2007
  • The relationship between the pulse FWHM (full-widths at half maximum) and the energy of gammaray bursts (GRBs)is explored based on the observed data from BATSE data base (http//cossc gsfc nasa gov/atse/).Based on a sample of 64 FRED (fast rise and exponential decay)pulse bursts better fitted with the KRL model (refer equation (22)in [1]), it is found that 63, out of the 64 sources, belong to either the platformpower-law-platform feature class or the peaked feature group.The classifications for 64 sources could be sorted into five models in detail a)a power law range could be observed in 34 sources;b)a lower band platform could be observed or suspected in 18 bursts;c)a higher band platform could be observed or suspected in 7 sources;d)a peaked feature could be observed or suspected in 4 GRBs;e)the other model from the four types above could be observed in 1 sources.The result suggests that there exists a power law relationship between the pulse FWHM of GRBs and the energy.And the result confirms the points from Qin et al (2005)[2] that the relationship is due to the Doppler effect of fireballs.
  • Articles Related

    [1]Zheng Jie, Jiang Linqiao. An Automatic Light-curve Extraction Pipeline [J]. Astronomical Techniques and Instruments, 2023, 20(1): 83-89. DOI: 10.14005/j.cnki.issn1672-7673.20220920.002
    [2]Zhang Yan, Ma Li, Yang Xing, Mao Lisheng, Li Tao, Gong Yunlu, Yi Tingfeng. Differences in Power Law Index Distribution of Hard X-ray Light Curves of AGN Subclasses [J]. Astronomical Research and Technology, 2020, 17(1): 8-12.
    [3]Yu Qiuyu, Liu Zhijie, Wang Pei. Fast Radio Bursts Statistics [J]. Astronomical Research and Technology, 2019, 16(2): 167-177.
    [4]Zhao Cui, Lin Ganghua, Deng Yuanyong, Wang Guoping. Design and Implementation of a System for Statistics of Data Flows of the Huairou Solar Observation Station [J]. Astronomical Research and Technology, 2014, 11(3): 311-316.
    [5]Yin yue, Bai yang, Zhang Tairong, Li Mingjun. A Revisit of the Luminosity-Ep relation of Gamma-Ray Bursts [J]. Astronomical Research and Technology, 2013, 10(2): 121-127.
    [6]PENG Zhao-yang, Qin Yi-ping. A K-S Test for the Distinctions of Some Spectral and Light Curve Characters of the Two Classes of Gamma-Ray Bursts [J]. Astronomical Research and Technology, 2006, 3(3): 228-238.
    [7]SU Cheng-yue, HAN Zheng-yu. A Simple Shock Model for the Light Curve of Gamma-ray Bursts [J]. Astronomical Research and Technology, 2005, 2(1): 1-11.
    [8]PENG Zhao-yang, QIN Yi-ping. Statistical Distinctions of the Spectra and Light Curves Between Two Classes of Gamma-Ray Bursts [J]. Astronomical Research and Technology, 2004, 1(2): 77-83.
    [9]MAO Ji-rong. Hydrodynamic Evolution of GRB Afterglow and the Study of the Light Curves [J]. Publications of the Yunnan Observatory, 2002, 0(1): 80-80.
    [10]QIAN Sheng-bang. Observational Evidence and Analysis of the Coupling between the Dynamical and the Thermodynamic Processes for Close Binaries [J]. Publications of the Yunnan Observatory, 2001, 0(1): 74-78.

Catalog

    Article views (249) PDF downloads (9) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return